The idea that disagreeing with an elected official means you’re being “disruptive” is preposterous in a democracy. The idea that you have to go along with the party line in a non-election season “for the sake of unity” is ridiculous. Fundamental pattern disruption is called for.

Dec 28, 2020 · 2:25 PM UTC

50
263
20
1,563
Load newest
Replying to @marwilliamson
Yes.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Succinctly - it's disagreeing without being disagreeable. Any official who says that's disruptive, should not be re-elected
Replying to @marwilliamson
So what do you call #resist ?
Replying to @marwilliamson
We're fighting against Fascists who wish to destroy our democracy and our country. And Biden is worried about "embarrassing" them. What a joke.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Disrupt the corrupt #ForcetheVote for #Medicare4All
Replying to @marwilliamson
Again ... "Dylan Ratigan"... said that people should move away from parties and the party line ... and begin to vote independently on every issue!
Replying to @marwilliamson
You voted for this. This is exactly what happens when you do not deny them power in general elections. Just attempt to primary them will never win enough. If you want accountability for neolibs occupying Leftist electoral space it must be forced by denying them power in GEs.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Always #QuestionAuthority.
Replying to @marwilliamson
There is like 5 US government types. You as a politician should know that.
Replying to @marwilliamson
#ForceTheVote!
2
Load more