The idea that disagreeing with an elected official means you’re being “disruptive” is preposterous in a democracy. The idea that you have to go along with the party line in a non-election season “for the sake of unity” is ridiculous. Fundamental pattern disruption is called for.

Dec 28, 2020 · 2:25 PM UTC

50
263
20
1,563
Load newest
Replying to @marwilliamson
So the imperative during an election season is to “go along with the party line” even if you forcefully disagree? That mindset is why we are where we are in this country. Meaningful change by definition requires disruption. #M4A #ForceTheVote
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
Replying to @marwilliamson
What's rediculous is liberals - who have never once been an ally to the leftist cause in any way, shape or form - having the sheer unmitigated gaul to speak of "unity". These people want my "unity"? Well I want M4A, UBI, and public education expanded to college.
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
I am Disruptive and I am Proud! ✊
Replying to @marwilliamson @IkeHillel
I’d like to add also in an election season as well. Never sacrifice your morality.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson @PeaceOverProfit
🔮🔮🔮
Replying to @marwilliamson
Typical of dictatorships.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Please see this clip and tell me if this is “disruptive” or vitriolic rhetoric aimed at dividing the left and tearing an imperfect politician but one of the best we have completed down. He also called her evil and said she should be deathly afraid. Please call him out!
1
1
0
Replying to @marwilliamson
So you disagree with the shutting down of anti-lockdown protests and the punishment for civil disobedience of opening your business, and barring the public from public governmental hearings?
Replying to @marwilliamson
Hence the people's Act
Load more