No, they are not significant and surely she knows that. The majority of people who serve in the US Congress - including her - spend that much on a holiday night out to dinner with the kids and grandkids.
The Recount
 @therecount
21 Dec 2020
Speaker Pelosi on $600 direct payment checks: "I would like them to have been bigger, but they are significant."

Pelosi On $600 Direct Payments

194
663
52
4,938
I guess considering the gop didn’t want any direct payments to people at all it is significant. Still coulda worded it better.
3
6
Replying to @NomDePume @therecount
We have got to stop enabling her. This is ridiculous. And we have got to stop enabling her enablers in the Democratic Party.

Dec 21, 2020 · 5:44 PM UTC

6
1
102
Replying to @marwilliamson @NomDePume @therecount
@NomDePlume no one wanted payments? That's simply not true. Mnuchin and Trump had a more generous plan two months ago but Nancy didn't want a "win" for Trump. Hawley sponsored this bill. She's more concerned about respect "due to" committee chairs.
1
1
0
Replying to @marwilliamson @NomDePume @therecount
#DictatorTrump is a narcissistic psychopath who’s broken rules, laws, pardoned felons, attacking democracy, stacked judges, fired anyone who didn’t kiss his gross, fat ass & protect #putin #CorruptAndComplicitGOP #AGBARR have done NOTHING to reign him in. Talk about ENABLERS!
1
1
Replying to @marwilliamson @NomDePume @therecount
I think Pelosi must be fierce behind the scenes to be 1st woman Speaker & voted in as that more than once.
Replying to @marwilliamson @NomDePume @therecount
peoplesparty.org/
1
Replying to @marwilliamson @therecount
Who could have done better given the gop wanted no checks?
2
6
Replying to @marwilliamson @NomDePume @therecount
You shouldn't be so critical Marianne. You sell people smoke and mirrors. You're not the great psychic you pretend to be. A great psychic doesn't sell their services because you ultimately lose them if you use them for profit.