No, they are not significant and surely she knows that. The majority of people who serve in the US Congress - including her - spend that much on a holiday night out to dinner with the kids and grandkids.
The Recount
 @therecount
21 Dec 2020
Speaker Pelosi on $600 direct payment checks: "I would like them to have been bigger, but they are significant."

Pelosi On $600 Direct Payments

Dec 21, 2020 · 5:28 PM UTC

194
663
52
4,938
Load newest
Replying to @marwilliamson
She more than knows. @SpeakerPelosi YOU WILL end up at The Hague for #CrimesAgainstHumanity, along w @senatemajldr, Trump, Barr et el. And YOU WILL be prosecuted for #ActiveGenocide agnst your own civilian population #ForceTheVote @AOC @UNHumanRights @UNGeneva @CIJ_ICJ @UN_HRC
Replying to @marwilliamson
@SpeakerPelosi is a joke. It took her 8 months to get people 600 bucks? She doesn’t deserve her position as speaker. AOC would have done much better. #retirepelosi
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
#ReplacePelosi NOW! #ForceTheVote #NoLine3
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
I keep seeing the checks being referred to in plural but does that mean one $600 check for everyone who qualifies or are there going to be multiple $600 payments?
Replying to @marwilliamson
@GOP don't want anything for regular people. Pelosi doesn't have much to work with
Replying to @marwilliamson
That would pay for a light lunch where she lives.
Replying to @marwilliamson
GIF
Replying to @marwilliamson
No Nancy. Not ‘significant’. These people are fucking clueless about how their constituents live.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Dems are clearly not tired 😴 of losing 🤡
Replying to @marwilliamson
She is disgusting and should have already been removed from office for treason against the American people not to mention being intoxicated while making decisions on our behalf she needs psychiatric help!!!!!!’
Load more