No, they are not significant and surely she knows that. The majority of people who serve in the US Congress - including her - spend that much on a holiday night out to dinner with the kids and grandkids.
Speaker Pelosi on $600 direct payment checks: "I would like them to have been bigger, but they are significant."

Dec 21, 2020 · 5:28 PM UTC

194
663
52
4,938
Replying to @marwilliamson
One of her refrigerators cost 4X the amount of this check.
That’s the dumbest shit I have heard so far today. We can’t judge good or evil? Um yeah, we can. If you can only tell the difference between bad and better you’re an idiot or brainwashed by religion or something. Either way you have unmasked yourself as being part of the problem.
Replying to @marwilliamson
So what TF exactly do they think the reason people are on PANDEMIC Unemployment Assistance in 2020 to start with? And just like that it's not about the pandemic anymore, it's about a rate number depending on what state you live in while Covid-19 cases are skyrocketing. 🤔🤷‍♂️🇺🇲 😡
Replying to @marwilliamson
I'm thinking that they are significant in that direct payments happenned at all.
Senate and House Republicans: Your lack of action is so un-American that you don’t deserve being Members of Congress: Withholding adequate survival payments Ignoring mass evictions Punishing Blue States and Cities Crippling the Fed for political gain Treasonous dereliction.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Or at the hair salon
Step aside or people need to make it a priority and get to the polls?!!
Replying to @marwilliamson
Maybe everyone who is bitching should add that up! I don't think that she met the individual payout was substantial I think she means the entire amount. Our country is in a deficit.
Replying to @marwilliamson
But.... this would pay for her beloved ice cream 🙄