Word in about Biden's economic communications team; we're supposed to be excited since so many are women. 1) That means very little in terms of real diversity of thought & 2) Economic holdovers from Clinton/Obama nothing to write home about since income inequality grew under both

Nov 29, 2020 · 10:51 PM UTC

95
273
30
2,026
Load newest
Replying to @marwilliamson
It’s basically Obama’s third term
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
Bingo. Dude’s bought and paid for by the big banks and credit card companies. As long as the easy money keeps flowing, they don’t care what genders and colors of people are the figureheads.
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
(Women) providing excuses why we cannot afford to feed, house, or provide care for American citizens as we launch wars overseas funded by bleeding the working class. Does that make it better somehow?
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
Neera Tanden is far worse than you're saying here. :(
38
Replying to @marwilliamson
Did you really think Biden was going to do something about income inequality? Come on! Meet the new boss, same as the old boss. We’ll be bombing the Middle East before you know it.
3
11
Replying to @marwilliamson
Welcome back to “normalcy”!!
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
They’re weaponizing people’s identities to insulate themselves from criticism. It’s downright malfeasance from the party that’s supposed to be protecting marginalized groups, instead they’re using them as shields and trophies.
2
3
1
34
Replying to @marwilliamson
Biden hasn't even "officially" selected these women and you're already basically saying their diversity hires. If you have legitimate problems with their policies fine, but can we not play the "anti identity politics" game when you don't even have a legit criticism?
2
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
We’re not only supposed to be excited, if we criticize we are sexist or racist. It’s the genius of idpol
1
3
Load more