Is the best way to push Biden in a less corporatist & more humanitarian direction to stay within the Democratic Party in exchange for perceived (or imaginary) access, or to form another party that could actually threaten the citadels? Not saying I know the answer; I’m just asking

Nov 29, 2020 · 5:39 PM UTC

337
101
36
883
Replying to @marwilliamson
The first makes you delusional and the second is a fool's errand. The only option is to disengage from the circus of deceit and engage in direct action. Electoral politics is dead.
Replying to @marwilliamson
I think both, but a third party is a necessity along with educating the public to reject the “lesser of two evils” argument.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
I love that song #Today that @Alanis Morissette made for you in 2014!
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
It’s a critical question. History notwithstanding, I believe that external forces are required.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Those parties are one in the same. INDEPENDENT FOR LIFE!!!
Replying to @marwilliamson
I wouldn't have said this a few months ago, but now I'm thinking the only thing left is to form a new political party that can take on & replace the Democrats it would be a messy prospect, though Peoples Party candidates and progressive Dems facing off against one another
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
A political party that cannot embrace universal healthcare during a pandemic or soundly beat a coal loving mad king, is next to worthless. I’ve already joined @PeoplesParty_US 🙏🦋🙏
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
I just know that I'm glad you're the one asking the question out in the open 🙏🏆
Replying to @marwilliamson
Both are needed. It has to be both 👍