There is nothing anti-religious about politicians seeking to protect the health of their constituencies by limiting the number of congregants in a closed space during a pandemic; what’s anti-religious is to use God as an excuse for doing something that you know could harm people.
170
387
67
2,710
But there is something anti-constitutional about it: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.....or the right of the people peaceably to assemble”
1
4
Replying to @mcrae_woodrow
It had nothing to do with religious expression, and it was only for as long as the pandemic lasted.

Nov 27, 2020 · 2:45 AM UTC

4
30
wrong...it had everything to do with religious expression. free exercise means just that...to worship as you see fit. you may not like it, but that's the facts, Jack.
that's what tyranta also say, this suspension of your freedoms and rights is only temporary through this emergency...they never get them back.
Replying to @marwilliamson
I keep forgetting about that Constitutional footnote: “...except in the case of a pandemic.”
4
This is narrowed to what you believe to be religious expression. There’s also specific clauses in the constitution that protect these rights-under religion and assembly. Your socialist bent is also shockingly ignorant. 100M dead ppl under Euro socialism wish to differ.