There is nothing anti-religious about politicians seeking to protect the health of their constituencies by limiting the number of congregants in a closed space during a pandemic; what’s anti-religious is to use God as an excuse for doing something that you know could harm people.

Nov 27, 2020 · 2:36 AM UTC

170
387
67
2,710
Replying to @marwilliamson
Completely agree. That SCOTUS decision is deeply disturbing and dangerous. Today I fantasized about progressives having control of the house, senate, & POTUS—then using their supermajority to put 20 young progressives on the SCOTUS.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Half a year later and still applicable 🤦🏼‍♀️
Replying to @marwilliamson
Equal protection. Don't pick and choose who can gather and who can't. The virus doesn't
Replying to @marwilliamson
No. But it is anti-American.
Replying to @marwilliamson
No. Just anti-liberty
Replying to @marwilliamson
It’s wrong to NOT be responsible for ALL the citizens and allowing the god believers to infect each other and then taking it to coworkers, community members etc. Hypocritical Pro lifer but only for fetuses. Forget the living. #AmyCovidBarrett
Replying to @marwilliamson
I hate it when businesses or government--or religious institutions--"prostititute" my God for profit.
Replying to @marwilliamson
This puts my faith in God and man.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Whew glad your not a lawyer