There is nothing anti-religious about politicians seeking to protect the health of their constituencies by limiting the number of congregants in a closed space during a pandemic; what’s anti-religious is to use God as an excuse for doing something that you know could harm people.

Nov 27, 2020 · 2:36 AM UTC

170
387
67
2,710
Load newest
Replying to @marwilliamson
Looks like we’re going to have to trust churches to take care of their own members by continuing to hold online Services. Those who pack people into the pews, because they get more donations, are the ones who will know as scammers and con artists
Replying to @marwilliamson
Now do bars, restaurants, gyms, and protests. Either lock it down completely, or not at all. Government doesn’t get to pick and choose.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
You shall forever be Our Madam President...
1
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
Doesn't matter, the first amendment protects the Right to peaceably assemble. Any mandate to the contrary is in violation of the Constitution and any oath of office.
1
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Girl! Say again for the people in the back!
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Exactly! The Pope's article today, stating " governments must impose for the good of their people" and it doesn't " constitute some kind of political assault on autonomy or personal freedom! " nyti.ms/3nYkzwd
2
1
8
Replying to @marwilliamson
Never forgo freedom over “PERCEIVED” safety. Never
Replying to @marwilliamson
It's really sad how anti-christian so many so called Christians seem to be! As someone who is not that religious but grew up studying the Bible I wonder if half of these people ever read a single page from the book? Killing people just to pack out the Church? Not very Christian!
1
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
God has been an excuse to kill people since he was invented
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
Except that those some officials permitted, and endorsed, other gatherings. The 14th Amendment requires equal protection, which wasn't provided...
1
Load more