There is nothing anti-religious about politicians seeking to protect the health of their constituencies by limiting the number of congregants in a closed space during a pandemic; what’s anti-religious is to use God as an excuse for doing something that you know could harm people.

Nov 27, 2020 · 2:36 AM UTC

170
387
67
2,710
Load newest
Replying to @marwilliamson
It’s the flu with a 99.9 percent survival rate.what happened to you?
Replying to @marwilliamson
Bullshit!
Replying to @marwilliamson
Churches can use the same strategies Walmart uses to keep people safe - social distancing, masks. Secular Democrats Are anti-religious. Dedicate resources to the vulnerable, let the rest get back to normal life. Nature has the answer: herd immunity. Lock downs don't work.
Replying to @marwilliamson
We going to church witch. You can tell crap your master Satan.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Amen!
Replying to @marwilliamson
It’s anti freedom of assembly
Replying to @marwilliamson
Daniel Uhlfelder
 @DWUhlfelderLaw
27 Nov 2020
The Wyoming Republican governor who refused to implement a statewide mask mandate has COVID-19
Replying to @marwilliamson
GIF
Replying to @marwilliamson
they are closing churches and not stores. There is something a miss, they seem to targeting places and people. Its systemic discrimination and frankly un American
Replying to @marwilliamson
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble” I don’t see a pandemic exception in there & neither did SCOTUS.
Load more