There is nothing anti-religious about politicians seeking to protect the health of their constituencies by limiting the number of congregants in a closed space during a pandemic; what’s anti-religious is to use God as an excuse for doing something that you know could harm people.

Nov 27, 2020 · 2:36 AM UTC

170
387
67
2,710
Load newest
Replying to @marwilliamson
It’s all part of being a good capitalist. Have faith means obey & follow without question; the meek shall inherit the earth is to let them take advantage of us; and the more we suffer now, the richer we’ll be in the next life, means being poor isn’t so bad (unless you’re poor).🧐
Replying to @marwilliamson
It's "anti-politics" 101, "cry havoc and let slip the dogs of (culture) war", never mind the mayhem left in its wake: youtube.com/watch?v=N8ba5umi…
Replying to @marwilliamson
It's silly that the limitations were only imposed on churches in that order. If you can't see what is stupid about that than you're blinded by partisanship
Replying to @marwilliamson
It is tyranny.
Replying to @marwilliamson
“ my people die because the lack of knowledge “ . Wasn’t the religious people who crucified Jesus ?!
Replying to @marwilliamson
It's just illegal...
Replying to @marwilliamson
GIF
Replying to @marwilliamson
Politicians have no right to impose limitations in a free society Public servants can issue RECOMMENDATIONS according to available transparent data & those RECOMMENDATIONS should change as often as the available transparent data
Replying to @marwilliamson
1 There has been no record of Covid cases caused from these houses of worship during the past 8 months 2 the limits were not based upon size of the enclosed space 3 secular activities in the same zones could have more people indoors Maybe looking at the actual facts would help
Replying to @marwilliamson
Sure, we’ll just dissolve the separation of church and state because you’re scared. What could possibly go wrong?
Load more