There is nothing anti-religious about politicians seeking to protect the health of their constituencies by limiting the number of congregants in a closed space during a pandemic; what’s anti-religious is to use God as an excuse for doing something that you know could harm people.

Nov 27, 2020 · 2:36 AM UTC

170
387
67
2,710
Load newest
Replying to @marwilliamson
Ban cigarettes, alcohol, and fast food if you care about everyone’s health.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Simple answer... people and say this lightly Americans are dumb sheep.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Thou shall not kill. Doesn't that imply that we're morally obligated to protect the lives of others? Covid-19 doesn't give a damn whether you're in a Pew or online. It knows that EVERY C-19 infected person, believer or not, can infect 2.5 others. The SC should've done the math.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Gov't responsibility is provide factual info, backed by good science. Individual responsibility is to process this info and decide a proper course of action.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Using God as an excuse for doing something that you know could harm people is - historically - on brand for virtually every religion known to Earth.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Yes there is when they don’t limit BLM or ANTIFA.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Disappointed you have drunk the Covid koolaid. Do some research, talk to RFK Jr. Pleeeease!
Replying to @marwilliamson
Ppl of this Nation are also granted freedom and rights and should have personal accountability and responsibility for their actions and if they wish to pray they shall pray. It is not to disallow ppl their god given freedoms. 99% survival rate now. Y’all calm down. This is the US
Replying to @marwilliamson
What is truly sad, is that 10 is all that is needed for a minyan. Didn’t Jesus say “where 10 are gathered...”?
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
It’s all about passing the basket. $$
Load more