There is nothing anti-religious about politicians seeking to protect the health of their constituencies by limiting the number of congregants in a closed space during a pandemic; what’s anti-religious is to use God as an excuse for doing something that you know could harm people.

Nov 27, 2020 · 2:36 AM UTC

170
387
67
2,710
Load newest
Replying to @marwilliamson
What's your definition of health?
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Why should the government be able to have any say in what a church does? Should a church be able to tell the government anything it should do?
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
On this lower level of awareness, underneath the negative influence of fear, competition, ego & deception, there are as many different points of view as minds to create them. We still have yet to grow into Mature, Spiritual Beings capable of respecting each other’s points of view
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
There is nothing more undemocratic than politicians treating religious institutions less favorably than secular institutions
1
1
Replying to @marwilliamson @vjonesphoto
#TaxTheChurches
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
so shocking religion being used to harm people. and by that I'm totally being sarcastic.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Yes. However, there is the problem of inconsistency and selective enforcement for political reasons. To wit: threadreaderapp.com/thread/1…
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
True; it's just unconstitutional. Moving along...
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
My religion is, to live through Love. In every religion there is love, yet love has no religion. Not Christian or Jew or Muslim, not Hindu, Buddhist, sufi, or zen.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
The problem is religious institutions being singled out. Why arbitrarily limit religious congregations to 10 regardless of any other circumstances while allowing larger gatherings for other purposes?
1
Load more