There is nothing anti-religious about politicians seeking to protect the health of their constituencies by limiting the number of congregants in a closed space during a pandemic; what’s anti-religious is to use God as an excuse for doing something that you know could harm people.

Nov 27, 2020 · 2:36 AM UTC

170
387
67
2,710
Replying to @marwilliamson
Something similar to what socialism is trying to do.
3
1
1
4
Have you ever been to a socialist country? Let’s say, western Europe? Are you under the impression they were less free than we are?
7
1
38
more replies
Replying to @marwilliamson
Of course it's not anti-religous to tell people they can't practice their religion. 😂
2
9
The practice of religion exists inside the heart.
7
59
more replies
Replying to @marwilliamson
But there is something anti-constitutional about it: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.....or the right of the people peaceably to assemble”
1
4
It had nothing to do with religious expression, and it was only for as long as the pandemic lasted.
4
30
more replies
Replying to @marwilliamson
I disagree. Freedom of Religion will always be more important than a pandemic. Let people make decisions for themselves. Rules are made to be broken.
14
27
This has nothing to do with the freedom of religion. The limits were not because of religious expression but because of health concerns, and only for as long as the danger lasted.
14
2
96
more replies
Replying to @marwilliamson
you arent religious or spiritual at all, so you probably are on Cuomo's team believing that all Jews and Christians should be shut down to no more than 10 people, meanwhile, many other businesses dont have restrictions on size. and that makes sense to you.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
THANK YOU!
2
Load more