I agree on the surface but this is a feature of capitalism, not a bug. There is no such thing as "moral" capitalism. It will always regress back to amorality bc of the profit motive. The issue imo will always be between capitalism and class consciousness.
The issue isn’t capitalism vs socialism, so much is conscience and ethics versus soulless sociopathy. Without a change in consciousness either one becomes corrupt.
1
Replying to @hannahdelilahs
That’s why government regulations matter, and why a broken democracy is so dangerous. When the people lose control of the government unfettered corporate power takes over.

Nov 24, 2020 · 5:39 PM UTC

2
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
Yeah I totally agree that regulated capitalism w/ strong antitrust systems in place is much better than unfettered capitalism. I guess my question is what is the end-state we're looking for? It just seems like no matter how many regulations we put in place, capitalists find a
1
way to seize that power back. In the end, though, I think a social democracy is the first step to lessening income inequality and corporate control of our systems of power.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Government regulations aren't sufficient because Capital always finds a way to work around them or a way to repeal them. Capitalism IS itself morally bankrupt. The workers must own the means of production
1