Some people would rather lose than change their game plan.
Emma Vigeland @EmmaVigeland
16 Nov 2020
Wow. This would be an abject disaster. Harrison out-raised Graham by tens of millions of dollars and still lost the election by ten points. A massive fundraising apparatus is meaningless if there’s no ground game strategy... which is why Abrams would be an infinitely better pick.

Nov 16, 2020 · 6:37 PM UTC

16
21
2
289
Replying to @marwilliamson
But didn’t Abrams also lose
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Or we can more accurately state the people don’t vote for who raised more money. Maybe we should stop putting money as the main goal in politics, oh shocker none of our leaders like to think that way. Its all money and power not actually helping America or the world.
Replying to @marwilliamson
True 😭
Replying to @marwilliamson
“Money can’t buy me love.”
Replying to @marwilliamson
To be honest ... I really don't know much about this ... I tried to research it ... but I couldn't find anything I really understood ...
Replying to @marwilliamson
abrams is running for governor and took her name out of consideration
Replying to @marwilliamson
That's why I'm excited by the possibilities of political innovation via @katherinegehl's @Pol_Innovation - we really need to starve the beast. The only ones profiting off of the CIC are the PACS, media, consultants & staff. They all get paid no matter the outcome.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Agreed. Proof that it ain't just about money, but a well-crafted and thoughtful top-down and bottom-up gameplay.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Democrats have been on the inanity train for a while.
Replying to @marwilliamson
*cough cough @DNC cough*
Load more