So gazillionaires could have as many yachts & planes & penthouses as they pleased, we created a vast sea of undereducated people w/ the legitimate gripe their needs had been forsaken. When the party that cares suppressed the candidate who most wanted to help them, we were doomed.

Nov 15, 2020 · 3:21 PM UTC

93
161
27
1,376
Replying to @marwilliamson
there isn't a "party who cares" but otherwise i agree
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
Still playing the game by rules created within the madness of a belief in separation. There will be no healing until that foundational madness is healed. And that is an inside job.
1
By any objective examination of the platforms. Its really not hard, the guy who wanted everyone to have the necessities of life guaranteed wanted to help people more than tge man promising rich donors their lifestyles wouldnt fundamentally change.
4
You seem to be the only one confused lol
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
I really don’t believe that one can judge “who cared the most” or who “cares the most”. The new administration may not be what some people hoped for but it’s time to drop the past and the judgements and support all that can be accomplished NOW.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
I’m really into everything you’ve been saying. Following you here was a great move. I hope you stay in the sphere of public influence to help make change!
4
Replying to @marwilliamson
This and RBG not retiring during the Obama administration.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Amazing that you say the obvious and people disrespect you, the Dems need to stand up for the economically lower 75 percent by taxing the top 10 percent and spending the dosh on health care, cheaper college, infrastructure and green energy.
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
Why say this now? We need Biden to come back from the brink? Then we could look forward.