I’m less angry about Amy Barrett’s placement on the SCOTUS than I am deeply sad. Her presence on the Court will obstruct freedoms that many of our ancestors have fought and died for. I hope her radical views will be the dissenting and not the majority opinion in case after case.

Oct 26, 2020 · 11:33 PM UTC

119
216
26
1,839
Load newest
Replying to @marwilliamson
I hope we will have few cases go to court because Congress will do its damn job and pass laws compliant with the Constitution. Or amend it! That a law wasn't passed for same sex marriage rights, that the court had to make it up, is an embarrassing failure.
Replying to @marwilliamson
MW, you are a sorry, sad case, delivering fiction, gossip & rumors for which you have no basis, no fact. You have transformed yourself into a total failure.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Which freedoms are those? There are ways to keep most of the things you cherish. Pass laws at the state level where most of this stuff belongs.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Radical views? You've lost all context.
Replying to @marwilliamson
You have no idea how she will rule in cases brought to the Supreme Court.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Well do u really think she was passed through because of your thoughts. She was passed through because she's just like Mitch & Trump.......
Replying to @marwilliamson
I don’t see why this is sad. She is a well educated attorney and a proven judge. Sticking to the laws that are put in place is not a bad thing. It you don’t like the laws....elect new lawmakers. It’s really that simple.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Why make assumptions? Let's see how she judges once in court. Praying for EVERYONE's unbiased, fair and common sense judgment in SCOTUS.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Like what? What freedoms will Justice Barrett take away? Stop w/ the vague political talking points & be specific. If you can’t, then you’re a fraud like all the others.
Replying to @marwilliamson
But she will protect the second so I’m good.
Load more