I’m less angry about Amy Barrett’s placement on the SCOTUS than I am deeply sad. Her presence on the Court will obstruct freedoms that many of our ancestors have fought and died for. I hope her radical views will be the dissenting and not the majority opinion in case after case.

Oct 26, 2020 · 11:33 PM UTC

119
216
26
1,839
Replying to @marwilliamson
I shed a few tears, as they voted. Sad day 😔 🕊🇺🇸🕊 🙏 We will do better, tomorrow ✨
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
Pack the court...lets up the number to 13.
1
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
What freedoms will it obstruct?
Replying to @marwilliamson
You don’t know that she’s a radical. Your’e just fear mongering. She seems like a normal conservative to me. Give her a chance.
4
44
Replying to @marwilliamson
What radical views are those?
Replying to @marwilliamson
But if Joe was to get in, I’m sure you’d be all for packing the court, right Marianne?
Replying to @marwilliamson
So Conservative women are “bad”? So much for women supporting women
5
Replying to @marwilliamson
#GOPHypocrites will stop at nothing to grab power. #CourtPackerMitch blocked Obama's obligation under the #Constitution to name a successor to Scalia. #GOPHypocrites want Barrett there when #Obamacare comes up for a vote one week after the election. #PackingTheCourt
GIF
Replying to @marwilliamson
Actually, you can't predict the future. Remember, there was suppose to be WWIII if Trump won - he actually got us out of wars. The sky is not falling and everything will be okay. She's a great woman and judge.
Replying to @marwilliamson
What are her "radical" views?
Load more