Uh, slavery was allowed. Slaves were considered 3/5 of a human being. And women could not vote. Yes, the Constitution DOES change over time!
Replying to @sahilkapur
Amy Coney Barrett on originalism: "That means that I interpret the Constitution as a law... I understand it to have the meaning that it had at the time people ratified it. That meaning doesn't change over time and it's not up to me to update it or infuse my policy views into it."

Oct 15, 2020 · 3:07 AM UTC

330
686
75
3,474
Replying to @marwilliamson
And it was the legislature that changed all of that, not judges.
2
4
Replying to @marwilliamson
Correct. And when amendments are ratified, they become Constitutional law and their meaning doesn't change over time and it's not up to her or me or you to infuse personal opinion into said meaning.
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
Not by judicial, executive, or even legislative fiat. You all are grown citizens. You know this. Yet here you are.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Via constitutional amendment. Not based on selective interpretation driven by political bias.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
There is a process for amending the constitution, in which the judicial branch takes no part. The MEANING of the written text doesn't change over time.
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
Yes, via constitutional amendments. Did you seriously run for president without a basic knowledge of civics? I regret donating to you
1
1
34
Replying to @marwilliamson
Everything changes over time.
1
Slaves werent considered human beings at all. The 3/5 compromise came after abolition
1
1
You're saying something different than ACB's statement. The meaning of the words should be interpreted and applied as they were originally written and understood at the time. The fact the judges over time do not stay consistent in that approach just highlights the problem.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
and the masks are off. evidently there's a whole generation that missed 'schoolhouse rock'.
6