Uh, slavery was allowed. Slaves were considered 3/5 of a human being. And women could not vote. Yes, the Constitution DOES change over time!
Sahil Kapur @sahilkapur
13 Oct 2020
Replying to @sahilkapur
Amy Coney Barrett on originalism: "That means that I interpret the Constitution as a law... I understand it to have the meaning that it had at the time people ratified it. That meaning doesn't change over time and it's not up to me to update it or infuse my policy views into it."

Oct 15, 2020 · 3:07 AM UTC

330
686
75
3,474
Load newest
Replying to @marwilliamson
Wow Mary of blue kool aid drinking idiocy is a stretch even for you...😎
Replying to @marwilliamson
Wow. Not again. 🤦‍♂️ We have the stupidest political class in all of the world.
Ex-Jersey Boomer @notafinger42
14 Oct 2020
Replying to @AnandWrites
Yet again the old three-fifths canard. The constitution does not say black people are three-fifths of a person. The slavers wanted to count all slaves and the anti-slavery colonies didn’t want to count them at all. Actually think about why and you may learn something. 🤦‍♂️
Replying to @marwilliamson
ACB is basically just a robot. She keeps saying she only follows the laws, leaving no room for any critical thinking on her part.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Yes, but it’s not the courts job to pass amendments or change the laws.
Replying to @marwilliamson
There IS such a thing as excess deference.
Replying to @marwilliamson
I would like to hear your comments on the 13th and 19th Amendments
Replying to @marwilliamson
God you are stupid. Give it a rest.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Lol
Replying to @marwilliamson
thewrap.com/rudy-giuliani-up…
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Another bat
Load more