As usual, this is the one who is saying it like it is. Thank you Ralph…
Why aren't Democrats probing Barrett re: her mentor Scalia's notorious decision in Bush v. Gore that selected Bush as president in 2000? This was such a judicial coup d'etat that every time Scalia was asked about it in visits to law schools he would merely shout "get over it." -R

Oct 14, 2020 · 8:55 PM UTC

16
57
2
313
Replying to @marwilliamson
What a ridiculous connection. It’s like arguing that you’d be guilty of Obama’s administration spying on Trump’s 2016 campaign just because you tried to run against him in 2020. Can’t you guys ever do a basic critical analysis?
Replying to @marwilliamson
Ralph pulled votes away from Dems adding to the whole debacle
Replying to @marwilliamson
Marion, it is my thinking that several of the women senators should read aloud what Ruth Bader Ginsberg’s last wish was and ask for Amy’s reaction
Replying to @marwilliamson
I hope someone does bring this up!
Replying to @marwilliamson
They HAVE been... when the nominee basically "pleads the fifth" when any Democrat questions there is no way around it. It's a sham hearing!
Replying to @marwilliamson
Clearly she would vote like her mentor because why? She doesn’t think for herself or.., what?
Replying to @marwilliamson
Blame a clerk for her judge's decision?? Evil
Replying to @marwilliamson
Someone did ask her today but as per usual, she had no opinion on it. I forget who asked.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Nader however neglects to mention his own role in that outcome.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
It doesn't matter if they ask her, Coney Barrett would answer the same way she's essentially answering everything else: "I can't answer."