When asked during the hearings if it would be Constitutional to criminalize IVF treatments, she will not answer & says that that’s a hypothetical question. It is not a hypothetical at all.

Oct 13, 2020 · 8:20 PM UTC

55
133
8
783
Replying to @marwilliamson
Hi, @rural_united is a brand-new group focused on promoting rural democratic tickets in areas of the country often forgotten! Please follow and retweet! Let’s usher in a new era for our rural communities nationwide!
Replying to @marwilliamson
WILL YOU PLEASE RUN AGAIN FOR SOMETHING?
Replying to @marwilliamson
Yes it is.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Any aren’t we talking more about how she loves football? 🤓
Replying to @marwilliamson
Ms. Williamson, the comments you are making about ACB's answers in her confirmation hearing are not very flattering to your intellect. Either your comments truly are a reflection of your actual intellect, or you have an agenda. I would prefer the latter.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Please explain why it’s not hypothetical?
Replying to @marwilliamson
Yes - it is hypothetical because it has ZERO context. Even Roe vs Wade had context in its decisions.. it was not a case of abortion vs no abortion.. if you think so - you need to look again !