When asked during the hearings if it would be Constitutional to criminalize IVF treatments, she will not answer & says that that’s a hypothetical question. It is not a hypothetical at all.

Oct 13, 2020 · 8:20 PM UTC

55
133
8
783
Load newest
Replying to @marwilliamson
Isn't the whole point of this to engage in hypotheticals? To understand where she stands? She is so bad faith.
6
6
Replying to @marwilliamson
If Roe is overturned, it would be.
Replying to @marwilliamson
She dodged & weaves, dodges & weaves, typical republican & I can see why trump picked her. She’s a sycophant & will do his bidding. Disgraceful. #NoJusticeNoVote #NoBarette
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Who’s trying to criminalize IVF? Has it ever been put forward? It’s called “fear mongering” and you’re guilty.
Replying to @marwilliamson
IVF ... (In vitro fertilization) ... This is a last resort for many woman who want to have children ... when asked if this ... Common Procedure ... is criminal ... she would not answer and called it hypothetical ... She's lying through her teeth!
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
They are using the hearings as personal platforms to put down American conservatives. Nothing to do with the court
Replying to @marwilliamson
I have not been watching. I don't care about spin. I guess she is an expert on dodging questions. It should be the 11th Commandment "Thou should not spin"
Replying to @marwilliamson
Well, she's not answering anything, she's too busy acting like a politician by dancing around every question!
1
GIF
Replying to @marwilliamson
I think it would be helpful for a prospective Justice to have read and understood the Constitution.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Things are not as they appear to be! At a time of crisis why in the world would they push the hearings through and why would you ever believe that a job/ position or status in this world would cost people their souls. She can’t answer because she is wrapped in lies just like DJT
Load more