When asked during the hearings if it would be Constitutional to criminalize IVF treatments, she will not answer & says that that’s a hypothetical question. It is not a hypothetical at all.

Oct 13, 2020 · 8:20 PM UTC

55
133
8
783
Load newest
Replying to @marwilliamson
It's hypothetical because she doesn't know the acronym. Neither do I
Replying to @marwilliamson
Do better Marianne. It’s totally hypothetical because she isn’t in a situation where the question can be legally answered. She’s not going to get herself caught up in nonsense, like she said, she isn’t a “legal pundit”
Replying to @marwilliamson
Her confirmation hearings should be hypothetical until February 2021.
1
6
Replying to @marwilliamson
The confirmation is already a done deal, regardless of what she says or doesn't say.
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
You KNOW that she'd rule against IVF saying that it goes against what God intended. No science. Just her religious beliefs.
Replying to @marwilliamson
I thought hypothetical questions were fair game ever since Republicans started hyperventilating over “court packing” 🤔
1
16
Replying to @marwilliamson
I would imagine that with the insane profits that IVF drives for the medical industrial complex, no institution in America will be cancelling that any time soon. Would be great to fund some widespread holistic fertility knowledge tho!
1
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
SHE CANT. shes said it like 500 times. They just keep asking her questions she cant answer.
Replying to @marwilliamson
I don't think you understand what hypothetical means at all.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Let us understand, you want a justice who is on your side but being a justice means looking at all perspectives @marwilliamson you are looking out for you not all. And as much as you say you are looking out for liberty, freedom means all views, all rights!
Load more