Oh no...
In a recent dissent, Amy Coney Barrett wrote that the right to vote and serve on juries belonged "only to virtuous citizens." Her opinion also suggests that all civic rights are subject to virtue-based exceptions.

Sep 27, 2020 · 4:46 AM UTC

35
121
6
450
Welcome to Authoritarian Theocracy America, we’re headed your way in Australia too. #FauxChristian Evangelicals have highjacked our Democracy.
1
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
you just have to love her into submission with positive psychic energy its fine dont worry
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
"Virtuous" = Educated? White? wealthy? all of the above? how does this false narrative this woman believes in become so deeply engrained in a persons belief system? A super "religious" woman.
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
Is this even debatable that she shouldn't be nominated? Now, would you take her nomination for a 1 year UBI and expansion of M4A for a year? I doubt that'd be even up for an option anyways. I am no legislative magician but I know plenty of things have been blocked in the past.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Well anyone who ignores the constitutional voting rights amendment, or supports taking healthcare and marraige equality IS NOT VIRTUOUS.
1
That is the problem when people decide their way is the only right way, and then appoint themselves the rule enforcer.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Virtuous as defined by who? Here we go.
3
She is a danger to women rights , we can’t let her be placed on the Supreme Court