Oh no...
In a recent dissent, Amy Coney Barrett wrote that the right to vote and serve on juries belonged "only to virtuous citizens." Her opinion also suggests that all civic rights are subject to virtue-based exceptions.

Sep 27, 2020 · 4:46 AM UTC

35
121
6
450
Replying to @marwilliamson
Kanter v. Barr, you might want to read it.
Replying to @marwilliamson
I admire the fact that you support restoring the rights of convicted felons to own firearms. That's what the case was about.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Now you're worrying that people are gonna lose the right to vote? Just stop, it's not gonna happen. There are literal amendments about this already.
2
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Convicted felons lose rights. I disagree but you act like this is a new thing. It would be a nice change if their rights were restored.
Replying to @marwilliamson
I wonder if she feels the corrupt president should have been removed when impeached, virtuous is not what he represents.
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
She's a psycho w/a law degree .. hate to break it to you but your nation is FULL of them. #Murica
Replying to @marwilliamson
Oh yes... Good grief...
Replying to @marwilliamson
We know where this goes - 4th Reich.
6
Replying to @marwilliamson
"Virtuous citizens" and "Virtue-based exceptions" ... what are they ... and who makes that determination? ... and she has been nominated for the Supreme Court! ... Wow!