Just as there’s a special criminal category for violent assault that’s an expression of bigotry (hate crime), there should be a special category for violent assault (such as driving car into a crowd of protestors) that’s intended as a direct effort to suppress peaceable assembly.

Sep 25, 2020 · 9:42 AM UTC

63
110
6
675
Replying to @marwilliamson
I nominate or maybe second Marianne Williamson for Head of the Ministry of Peace - we should start the Civil division right now. Eventually, it’ll be Federally funded that means paid for by the people.
4
Replying to @marwilliamson
There should be special penalties for depriving anyone of any civil right.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Instead, Tx & Fl are criminalizing being the hood ornament & legalizing vehicular manslaughter
Replying to @marwilliamson
Most often what I’m seeing is that the car is a target for those who would impede its driving, break its windows, and pull its driver out of the vehicle, let alone put the driver into the terrible position of unintentionally hurting someone in an effort to escape violence.
Replying to @marwilliamson
I agree there are those who lack the ability of reasoning but those of us who knows how to reason knows it's better to agree to agree to disagree peacefully.The lips of wisdom are closed, except to the ears of understanding. Impulse has consequences. 🤔🤔
Replying to @marwilliamson
In Europe they call it terrorism 🤷🏻‍♀️
Replying to @marwilliamson
LMFAO, get the fuck out of here with that authoritarian shit.
Replying to @marwilliamson
What don’t you get? You are thick headed. They aren’t peaceful assemblies. They are riots. You can’t be so ignorant to not notice innocent people being MURDERED. When your car is surrounded by rioters and you fear for your safety and life... safety first. Sorry for your ignorance
Replying to @marwilliamson
Is it not just terrorism?
1