Mark Zuckerberg, I don’t know what universe you’re living in but people are using Facebook to facilitate a fascist takeover of the United States. No, this is not just “everyone having a chance to have their voices heard.” Your insistence on neutrality amounts to complicity.

Sep 13, 2020 · 7:44 AM UTC

247
753
86
5,457
Replying to @marwilliamson
You would have helped Louis XVI break up those printing presses, eh?
Replying to @marwilliamson
Are you for free speech or not? If your answer has a "but" in it, then we know you're not.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Please also remember though, that there are lots of people being censored and silenced these days because they're not considered "woke enough". To them, the censorship looks like the fascism. I'm just woke enough to be uncomfortable with what I see on BOTH sides.
12
Replying to @marwilliamson
You push your followers to abandon our values and vote Joe. Now, you are promoting censorship. When you first entered the presidential race, you were critical of Julian Assange and said, on Jimmy Dore interview, “Julian, whose side are you on anyway?” Wth? Are you ok?
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
So this is where liberalism stands today - "neutrality is unacceptable". You must peddle a one sided leftist narrative to be considered balanced and fair. They do not even attempt to hide it anymore. They say it proudly - you must be biased!
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Neutrality and free speech are buzzwords used at best to hide cowardly amorality, at worst to promote an extreme agenda under the guise of equal treatment. It's time social networks own their responsibilities and take a stance.
1
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
How do you write a policy which will exclude the promotion of fascism that won't be immediately used against people standing up to fascism? Give me a wording that works for that, and I'll be seriously impressed.
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
#BigData Traces You. And Not Only Big Data. #GennadyZherebilov suggests that social networks have to remind their users of a 'golden rule' like every honest policeman does. 'Warning of Miranda' (1966, USA) : 'Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law'
2
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
In the USA, under the First Amendment, hate speech is free speech -- an expression of opinion. If it does not incite clearly to violence, it is protected by the Constitution. That's freedom. That's democracy. That's human rights.
1
1