Should it not be a prerequisite for the presidency that the person be a decent human being?

Sep 1, 2020 · 5:21 PM UTC

706
409
134
4,285
Replying to @marwilliamson
Rules you out 😂😂😂
Replying to @marwilliamson
Require they love dogs
Replying to @marwilliamson
Successful politician - decent human being = oxymoron. You didn’t get anywhere. Tulsi didn’t get anywhere. I rest my case.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Cant be in a position of forced power over others and be decent.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Wow Marianne, just wow! This is you’re idea of a “decent” person 🤯🤯🤯 Don’t worry we won’t forget where you stood on this! 🤬
Replying to @marwilliamson
I once believed that it was a requirement
Replying to @marwilliamson
Decent human being launch drone strikes...
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Of course not. That’s why we have the constitution. That’s the basis on which the entire country was formed. King George, anyone? It’s disconcerting you don’t understand this. Ask yourself, who determines what is ‘decent’? Who will be - God forbid - our modern day Robespierre?
Replying to @marwilliamson
Do womanizers count? FDR, JFK, Bill Clinton all come to mind.