So let’s get clear. When the Proud Boys came to attack Left wing protesters, the police stayed away & didn’t intervene. But after the Proud Boys and their ilk left, the protesters who remained were told that they’re involved in an unlawful assembly and the police came after them?

Aug 23, 2020 · 11:28 AM UTC

319
1,780
137
8,338
Load newest
Replying to @marwilliamson
Right, they came to attack. What can't we all get a space to speak? Is your side somehow preternaturally endowed with the gift of perfection. When your first move in a discussion is to scream & throw punches expect to get trounced in return.
1
GIF
Replying to @marwilliamson
Yup sounds about right... this is trumps America...
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
yes. that's correct Karen
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
This is an example of selective enforcement, based upon what law enforcement perceives as a threat to their methods, not to mention their personal biases. It's not rocket science. Arrest the looters and violent agitators and leave the peaceful protesters alone.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
So you got Poor cops, poor proud boys, poor antifa, poor BLM, but yet MSM millionaires who are “authors” and “journalists” making snuff films for billionaires to have popcorn night when they come home...How fast things might change if the poor weren’t fighting each other...
1
GIF
Replying to @marwilliamson @74sessions
That's because police services are neither ideologically infused nor tend to attract violent, sexist racists into their ranks
1
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
They’ve been buddies. Look up the story on our police texting with the proud boys
1
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
Yup. #AbolishThePolice
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Some of those that work forces...
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Yes, and when we marched peacefully later, police declared it unlawful immediately I wish I were joking, but they literally said a crowd crossing a bridge was unlawful. We know which side they are on.
4
Load more