The USPS is not essential. Free markets would solve that problem in less than an hour.
16,559
871
4,212
4,944
Replying to @ACTBrigitte
No it could not. No private investment makes sense in something that has to go to some weird address, no matter what, even if just for one person. That’s the difference between public and private investment. Public investment is not for profit; it’s simply in service to society.

Aug 15, 2020 · 1:56 PM UTC

7
18
4
360
Replying to @marwilliamson @ACTBrigitte
North Korea only has DHL and they're doing fine
2
Replying to @marwilliamson @ACTBrigitte
Half of their service are obsolete due to amazon
6
Replying to @marwilliamson @ACTBrigitte
This is such rich BS, as the "free market" is currently getting bailed out by government tax money. 🤣
2
Replying to @marwilliamson @ACTBrigitte
These ghouls see the public, consumers, their fellow citizens of lesser means, as a cash crop, as chattel.
1
4
Replying to @marwilliamson @ACTBrigitte
Dam you're stupid.....
1
This tweet is unavailable
No. If all you’re after is making money-and in some aspects of the private sector that’s legitimate - you take a tiny rural place where only 3 people need their medicines off your route. It doesn’t make sense from a business perspective; that’s why it needs to be a public venture
3
3
59
more replies