At what point do we admit to ourselves that only an insane society risks massive loss of life among its children in order to procure the ability to risk massive loss of life among their parents in order to avoid massive losses of money among those who don’t care about either one?

Aug 11, 2020 · 5:14 AM UTC

162
1,336
92
5,328
Replying to @marwilliamson
It’s as if there is some unspoken pyramid scheme.
1
1
9
Yep.
1
10
Replying to @marwilliamson
Societies are by definition large enough to almost never be insane. Foolish yes. Stupid sure. But if you think a society is insane you should probably look for deeper insights.
5
3
Nazi Germany, oh Insightful One?
5
2
71
more replies
Replying to @marwilliamson @lovemyjessica22
In other words, we're doomed.
1
2
No. We just need to get very awake very quickly, in November and beyond.
1
31
Replying to @marwilliamson
What about an only child? Should they just stay locked up all the time? w no friends? bc 50% of deaths are people in nursing homes, that are already dying. The rest have (pre-) diabetes. Let’s address metabolic syndrome for the rest of us...more die from diabetes EVERY YEAR.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
mariannenow.com/issues/plan-… One thing is certain Marianne... None of this would be happening if your proposal for a U.S. Dept. Of Children and Youth were in place. “First you take care of the children!”
1
7
16
Replying to @marwilliamson @basche42
At about 5 years ago, when the GOP’s pledge to drown govt in the bathtub became a likely threat by Trump’s full-throated demagoguery You were of age in 2015, right? Warned us all how he would savage the nation if he won? Or nah, had other priorities?
3
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
After we admit we've been lied to about the severity of cv in the first place as a tactic to make sure Trump doesn't get reelected. Otherwise there would be no reason for the FDA to block successful treatments like HCQ.
5
15
Load more