Replying to @marwilliamson @Forbes
As a former classroom teacher of 1st, 2nd, and 3rd graders... I can attest to the efficiency of children spreading germs. They are interactive. That’s who they are! That’s what they do! Social distancing is not their thing!
1
3
Replying to @marwilliamson @Forbes
Kids need to be exposed to illnesses to help build their immune systems.
4
3
Replying to @marwilliamson @Forbes
Essential Reading,Folks HELLO charleseisenstein.org/essays…
Replying to @marwilliamson @Forbes
Thank you for sharing this. Reopening schools next month is absolutely absurd and reckless. I've decided that my children will be distance learning. It won't be easy (I have 6 kiddos), but it will be worth it to protect my family. There are no do-overs.
Replying to @marwilliamson @Forbes
Younger children who develop mild to moderate Covid-19 symptoms have 10 to 100 times as much of the virus in them as older children and adults … and when they cough, sneeze, or shout, they expel virus-laden droplets
1
1
Replying to @marwilliamson @Forbes
This is true with disease in general. Instead of focusing on how to get everything « back to normal » we need to figure out how to make things better. Kids are always vectors of disease - let’s be smarter about that. Let’s not accept all the deaths from flu
Replying to @marwilliamson @Forbes
This tweet is unavailable
2
Replying to @marwilliamson @MikePerryavatar @Forbes
We needed a study to know that children are little disease vectors?!?!
2
Replying to @marwilliamson @Forbes
Shocking that young children, who have a tiny fraction of the discipline, patience, and brain development of an adult, spread a contagious disease more effectively.
Replying to @marwilliamson @Forbes
Some things we have to learn the hard way. Wonder how many orphans we will have in a year.
1
1
Load more