Being an anarchist is not actually illegal. Being an agitator is not actually illegal. Trying to use either one of those characterization as a reason for denying people their rights - THAT is what’s illegal.

Jul 31, 2020 · 4:00 AM UTC

116
1,432
82
8,368
Load newest
Replying to @marwilliamson @phpress
But Politicians can deny people the right to vote. Politicians can create racial gang stalking laws in "War on Drugs" and still not be called out for it. #BLM
Replying to @marwilliamson
Why do you say "actually" instead of being an agitator/anarchist is NOT illegal? Why soften it. By the way I was always a fan of yours, used to attend your lectures in WEHO years ago, but the arrogance of your presidential attempt. Nah.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Burning down courthouses, looting, destroying businesses, beating people with different political beliefs than you...illegal. Making excuses for that behavior is negligent to say the least, and yet here you are.
Replying to @marwilliamson
GIF
Replying to @marwilliamson
Portland rioters?
Replying to @marwilliamson
marianne for senator
Replying to @marwilliamson
#SOCIOPATHS don't care about definitions, boundaries or the rules. #SOCIOPATHS have to be screened out of all positions of authority...including i.e. school crossing guard; doctors...they are #Insane, not neurotic. Rump is flat out #Insane
Replying to @marwilliamson
Breaking the law to further either end, however, IS illegal. And let’s face it—far too many of them do. Having a cause is NOT the same thing as having a case.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Denying people their rights is illegal @BadBunnyTwitch
Replying to @marwilliamson
What about being an anti-masker?
1
Load more