Being an anarchist is not actually illegal. Being an agitator is not actually illegal. Trying to use either one of those characterization as a reason for denying people their rights - THAT is what’s illegal.

Jul 31, 2020 · 4:00 AM UTC

116
1,432
82
8,368
Load newest
Replying to @marwilliamson
Exactly.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
That’s crazy that these governors are asking for federal aid because these peaceful protest. I watched cnn and saw nothing wrong. These governors are lying about damage and are trying to defraud the federal government.
Replying to @marwilliamson
This should be illegal
Replying to @marwilliamson
This ☝🏽🙏🏽
GIF
Replying to @marwilliamson
. @9000_prose
1 Oct 2019
1/ Misconceptions about anarchism abound, even among the left. A few salient features as I see it: Anarchism is not bomb-throwing mayhem, riots on the street. It is very much organized existence. Existence under rules, not rulers.
Replying to @marwilliamson
People used to fret over the difference between "constitutional" and "legal," or illegal, as it were. I'm currently more interested in what is "legal" (or illegal) and what is "enforceable." And how?
Replying to @marwilliamson
If you’re destroying property and trying to overthrow the government, it kinda does
Replying to @marwilliamson
I'm so glad you ran for president
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Actions have consequences.
Replying to @marwilliamson @aerwaves_
Looting is illegal. Burning private property is illegal. Vandalism is illegal. Assault is illegal. We know how this works, sit down.
Load more