There was a difference between being "anti-slavery" and being an Abolitionist. Being anti-slavery was noble but of itself didn't necessarily help one slave. Being an Abolitionist meant you'd crossed the line from "I'm against it" to "Not on my watch!" And that's where we are now.

Jun 5, 2020 · 9:26 PM UTC

34
487
22
2,281
Replying to @marwilliamson
You are over 150 years too late to be an abolitionist. Stop trying to keep racism and slavery on life support to indulge your fantasy of being the hero.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Always very clear and precise with your words!
I read this very interesting article about a Quaker in the early 1700s who was a radical abolitionist. One story about him is a family in his community kept a slave, one day he basically kidnapped his son (or daughter, it varies), took him to his cave home, and kept him amused.
1
Not even close... What a baseless statement, and to compare slavery to what's going on... Eh.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
I think you might be right🖤
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Be like John Brown.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
yes, Marianne, be a police abolitionist
3