I didn't say it had to be someone white. Her record in CA is not good. I was saying that simply picking someone black as a token is not the right way to go. Why not Stacy Abrams?
1
She has credentials other than being black you racist. If she was awful she wouldn’t have won so many times , and Obama wouldn’t have considered her for Ag. We’re you amazingly perfect 20 years ago ? Or even two ?
3
7
I know she does have other credentials, I never said she didn't. But during the campaign a lot of her mistakes also came to light. This has nothing to do with race. I want the best VP for Joe. If I was racist, why the hell would I recommend Stacy?
1
Stop assuming that everyone comment is racist. You don't know me, and you guys misunderstood my point. Its about qualifications, not color.
3
Because with you guys it’s always- “ Not that woman, but this one ok...” It’s frankly abusive and misogynistic. Just stop being so intimidated by qualified women, esp WOC. Her credentials are impeccable. I’ll hold her CJ reform record up to anyone at all in politics right now.
4
1
4
Its just my opinion of a candidate. Just like you prefer her, I prefer Marianne Williamson. See my other tweet, non of this was meant to be racial.
2
Williamson has a long history of work in training citizen lobbyists and in national political organizing. Bernie was her keynote for the @SisterGiant conferences she founded. medium.com/@matthewalb/ive-w…
1
2
Exactly. It amuses me to no end how people buy into the "Crystal Theory" and are ignorant of the facts. Its funny to watch people who claim to be so intelligent, spout off things without doing any research on what they are talking about. They only end up looking foolish.
3
2
Neither do I, and neither am I.
Jun 1, 2020 · 12:13 AM UTC
4
7






