1/ It’s not just pandemics that we were risking. Same with nuclear & environmental issues as well. When I was young we marched to “Ban in the bomb.”Today we’ve all just accepted a horrifying reality & do little more than cross our fingers hoping something terrible doesn’t happen.

May 19, 2020 · 12:59 PM UTC

18
60
6
331
2/ Environmentally, if we don’t do something radical within seven years we could have massive social collapse beyond anything we’ve ever seen. Whole swaths of continents too hot to grow food. Economic collapse. Food system collapse. Hundreds of millions of environmental refugees.
16
37
191
3/ The planet itself has become a ticking time bomb, and when this pandemic eases each and every one of us needs to become passionately involved in creating a different world. The opportunities will be there, we just need to become people ready & prepared to rise to the occasion.
12
35
3
176
Replying to @marwilliamson
Nuclear is the safest form of energy and is also the greenest
2
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
blogs.scientificamerican.com…
Replying to @marwilliamson @LovesTheBern
so true :(
Replying to @marwilliamson
That's why we have to abandon the idea that perpetual economic growth is sustainable. We need to scale down and go circular. We need to put wellbeing first.
1
7
Replying to @marwilliamson
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. We could’ve had this amazing person as the Democratic Nominee, instead, the DNC chose Joe Fucking Biden. Such a horrible, yet predictable outcome. America lost its chance at a world changing nominee. 😔
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
1/ So we can assume there will be a 2/? 3/? 4/? 5/?
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Gloom & Doom
Replying to @marwilliamson
Hi I’m reaching out again because my email hasn’t reached you. I would like to get a signed copy of your book to my partner. His bday is in a few days
Load more