You don’t get to determine my beliefs. I get to determine my beliefs. And I am revising nothing. Your vilification, and that of so many like you, is beginning to be exposed for the smear campaign that it was – and in the hands of people such as yourself, continues to be.

I don’t get to determine your beliefs. The record is there about your past statements and actions. History will judge you. Wash your hands.

You will find nothing I have ever said that was anti-vax. Nothing. Not one thing. We are living at a time when if anyone asks one single question, they are labeled anti-vax by Big Pharma and their dupes who take it from there.

When you ignore and go against the scientific evidence in order to endorse false fears about vaccines, you are an anti-vaxxer. Whether you call yourself that or not.

None of which I ever did. How do you call someone “anti-science” who has called for more scientific investigation? Slavish devotion to anything Big Pharma says does not make a person “pro-science,” especially since the opioid crisis & predatory Pharma practices associated with it

I mean, maybe it’s just me, but I feel like slavish devotion to science is actually a net positive about now.

I’m OK with that. The point is that there’s a difference between slavish devotion to science and slavish devotion to Big Pharma.

You claimed people you know became autistic from vaccinations... cnn.com/2019/08/15/politics/…

And if anything is going “against science” right now, it’s someone encouraging people to show up at the polls! I thought we were all supposed to try to stay home. Look, we should dial this back now. Where we agree is that the Democrat must win in 2020.

I didn’t encourage people to show up at the polls. I said your tweet that suggested the election results should be nullified and that Tom Perez is responsible for the elections was inappropriate and harmful.