You don’t get to determine my beliefs. I get to determine my beliefs. And I am revising nothing. Your vilification, and that of so many like you, is beginning to be exposed for the smear campaign that it was – and in the hands of people such as yourself, continues to be.
1
2
23
I don’t get to determine your beliefs. The record is there about your past statements and actions. History will judge you. Wash your hands.
1
4
You will find nothing I have ever said that was anti-vax. Nothing. Not one thing. We are living at a time when if anyone asks one single question, they are labeled anti-vax by Big Pharma and their dupes who take it from there.
2
3
21
When you ignore and go against the scientific evidence in order to endorse false fears about vaccines, you are an anti-vaxxer. Whether you call yourself that or not.
6
1
1
10
None of which I ever did. How do you call someone “anti-science” who has called for more scientific investigation? Slavish devotion to anything Big Pharma says does not make a person “pro-science,” especially since the opioid crisis & predatory Pharma practices associated with it
1
4
22
I mean, maybe it’s just me, but I feel like slavish devotion to science is actually a net positive about now.
1
2
I’m OK with that. The point is that there’s a difference between slavish devotion to science and slavish devotion to Big Pharma.
4
16
You claimed people you know became autistic from vaccinations... cnn.com/2019/08/15/politics/…
5
2
13
In 2012, I said I knew people who had said that. That was their belief.
Mar 18, 2020 · 2:28 AM UTC
3
1
12
