Why so little coronavirus testing? Because it would prove what our govt doesn’t want to acknowledge: to face the challenge we need a vast mobilization of $, infrastructure & public investment that goes way beyond their ideological insistence on letting people fend for themselves

Mar 12, 2020 · 6:13 AM UTC

111
594
32
3,512
Did you see the video from a few days ago? She says we need test kits and a vaccine. youtube.com/VPACQatSP-8
3
Then you're not talking about her. She's brilliant.
1
This is just creepy😱
State of Emergency is covering all things Coronavirus.
Almost. But love is a verb and involves action Love should be the BASIS for all public policy, which would include protecting and providing for the health and well-being of everyone.
1
2
That is also an accurate description- and now preferred by President Xi and others who want to give China a pass. That’s not me. So for me, doing me, it‘s Wuhan Coronavirus.
*ding - right answer this one
Whether they profit from it or not (and I recall that one of them said making not making it affordable would defeat the purpose of making it available) they are trying to DEAL WITH A PANDEMIC with medicine instead of *targeted travel bans* and *tax cuts*. Let's enourage them!!!
MARIANNE'S form of love is very practical...feed the children, care for the I'll, make amends to those who have been harmed by our system, make peace a priority and justice. Care forvthe planet. This is love, and love most certainly is what is needed.
I never paid much attention to Williamson before this primary but now that I’ve read a few of her books I am deeply impressed. I also adore how kind and loving her online followers are. I wish more online communication was like what we see here ❤️
3