What Bernie stands for is not radical or extreme. It’s nothing more than a return to the traditional FDR Democratic Party position of always being on the side of the working people in America. Prior to the 1980s, that was considered the core of the Democratic Party.

Mar 2, 2020 · 8:45 PM UTC

257
2,494
113
14,521
Those in both parties who paint Bernie as extreme are doing so in order to protect an economic paradigm that puts corporations before people. THAT is what should be seen as extreme.
78
950
51
4,478
Load newest
Replying to @marwilliamson @RichardBSpencer
Uh FDR was a socialist and globalist. Only way to be on the side of workers is to support INDUSTRY so they have WORK not Government handout.
Replying to @marwilliamson @ProudResister
#FDR was FAR more radical, his top marginal rate was 94% on all income over $200,000 and with a change in the amount of income exempt from taxation an estimated 12 million Americans were eliminated from the tax rolls entirely. #Bernie2020 #NotMeUs
Replying to @marwilliamson
GIF
Replying to @marwilliamson
clinton was a working person. Yoiur movement is for the rich. You divide the poor with pronises to make sure the rich stays rich
Replying to @marwilliamson
Thank you very much. THAT was the Democratic Party of my youth. I want it back.
Replying to @marwilliamson
I said something very similar to my friends on Twitter last night
Replying to @marwilliamson
Called it:
Theodore Arthur Somes III⚓️ @theodoresomes
26 Feb 2020
Listen, I’m not a @BernieSanders supporter, but his economic positions are no more radical than FDR’s - positions that would’ve been normal with our grandparents and great-grandparents. Saying his plans are extreme demonstrates an obvious ignorance of American political history.
Replying to @marwilliamson
I thought the parties switched
Replying to @marwilliamson
0
Load more