I don't know why Williamson would be chosen as a surrogate for a campaign given her prior positions not only rejecting medical science but in doing so, adding to outbreaks of another epidemic, that of measles, in the United States.
Murshed Zaheed @murshedz
2 Mar 2020
Replying to @murshedz
Another piece on key surrogate @BernieSanders is deploying in California as our state braces for #coronavirus 😷😡 thedailybeast.com/2020-candi…
28
67
3
169
Please do your due diligence before speaking erroneously. You were one of those that bought into the targeted campaign smears. She’s not anti-science… Anyone who does the research knows that. Time to get wise. 🤷🏽‍♀️
1
Clearly you do not.
1
4
Replying to @liberal_dawg10 @SamOdell5 @jljacobson
Calling for MORE independent scientific review hardly makes you “anti-science.”

Mar 2, 2020 · 8:27 AM UTC

3
1
12
Replying to @marwilliamson @SamOdell5 @jljacobson
Exactly!! You’re actually asking for more science. More science to make sure the people are even more safe. It’s amazing how that gets twisted. 🤷🏽‍♀️
1
2
This is misleading and dangerous. We HAVE the science that confirms that vaccines work. We HAVE 7 decades of global public health data, science, and human lives saved. To even suggest this is an unsettled issue contributes to anti-vaccine hysteria.
1
1
1
more replies
Replying to @marwilliamson @SamOdell5
And considering you R "calling" for something which @WHO, @CDCgov, @AmerAcadPeds and innumerable other professional orgs deem unnecessary and confusing against 7 decades of global public health data, overwhelming scientific & medical evidence, is in fact anti-vaxx. Just pls stop.
2
1
more replies