On the eve of this big week, let’s pause & remember: @BernieSanders, @JoeBiden, @ewarren etc are all good people. They’re part of the most grueling experience imaginable. We can disagree but still appreciate their humanity, refuse to personally demonize, and exercise compassion.
212
456
68
3,870
I like you Marianne. But I'm willing to have this debate with you. Have you seen Liz's latest lies and attacks on Bernie? Good people don't do that. Have you experienced the detriment imposed by Biden's policies over decades? Good people don't hurt other people for money.
7
11
126
Replying to @JohnnyAkzam @BernieSanders @JoeBiden @ewarren
If someone is attacking Elizabeth for attacking Bernie, they’re no different than she is! It’s totally unnecessary. We need to keep the energy high or our own negativity will defeat us before Trump even gets a chance to.

Mar 1, 2020 · 7:12 PM UTC

31
10
6
137
Load newest
Replying to @marwilliamson @JohnnyAkzam @BernieSanders @JoeBiden @ewarren
So, some questions: Does defending your candidate from an attack constitute an attack? Does stepping in to counter false or skewed propaganda or correcting the misinterpreted or misrepresented record of a candidate not your own count as an attack, or is it just fact checking?
Replying to @marwilliamson @JohnnyAkzam @BernieSanders @JoeBiden @ewarren
I agree with you Marianne. Constructive Criticism is one thing but when we get into attacking one another, it distracts us from the mission & brings our energies lower. We are much more powerful keeping our energies high & staying focused. I love what you bring to #NotMeUs.
4
Replying to @marwilliamson @JohnnyAkzam
Incorrect. Elizabeth Warren lied about Bernie's alleged sexist comment from Dec 2018 and has adopted a deranged transgender ideology, stating that her Secretary of Education must be approved by a transgender individual. Watch the following clip: youtube.com/Mk-yvUOQm0E
1
3
Replying to @marwilliamson @JohnnyAkzam @BernieSanders @JoeBiden @ewarren
There's a difference between attacking someone with a baseless personal smear, and attacking for their policy positions, or in this case lack of policy position. Bernie never stoops to that level. He sticks to the real issues.
6
Replying to @marwilliamson @JohnnyAkzam @BernieSanders @JoeBiden @ewarren
It's. So. Hard! but I agree @marwilliamson. I've learn to block trolls/bots, and focus on what I can do to help #NotMeUs win- texting, calling, knocking doors & using the BERN app to remind my friends to #VoteForBernie in #SuperTuesday. Time is ticking. app.berniesanders.com
4
11
Replying to @marwilliamson @JohnnyAkzam @BernieSanders @JoeBiden @ewarren
When Warren opens her mouth and makes a disingenuous statement or tells an outright lie, people need to confront her on it. She needs to be called out everytime it happens. They need to feel the sting of embarrassment. If they're not embarrassed, that tells you who they are.
Replying to @marwilliamson @JohnnyAkzam @BernieSanders @JoeBiden @ewarren
No deal! This is politics, and politicians who are in the game for personal rewards cannot be trusted as allies.
Replying to @marwilliamson @BernieSanders @JoeBiden @ewarren
It's not "attacking" to refute their lies with the truth, Marianne. And I think you know that. The "moral high ground" can definitely include defending oneself (or one's fellows) against false attacks and lies.
1
8
1
27
Replying to @marwilliamson @JohnnyAkzam @BernieSanders @JoeBiden @ewarren
They are different because one is running for president and the other is the constituency they mean to represent. She needs to be called out for gaslighting the front runner who represents what she claims to.
Replying to @marwilliamson @JohnnyAkzam @BernieSanders @JoeBiden @ewarren
Marianne, I've got an idea: If you wanna protect Warren from being "attacked" (replied to with facts), then you should cause a media buzz to make MSM networks book you as much as possible--and then you politely and nicely debunk/dispel/refute Warren's LIES on air. Problem solved.
1
2
Load more