The superdelegate system was designed to keep control of nomination process in the hands of party elite. It’s very undemocratic, and any candidate has a right to protest it if it’s used against them.
Bernie Sanders warns at #CNNTownHall that it will be “incredibly divisive” if a contested convention nominates a candidate who doesn’t have a “substantial plurality” of pledged delegates from the primaries

Feb 25, 2020 · 3:25 AM UTC

66
577
17
3,455
Replying to @marwilliamson
You know what would fix this? RANKED CHOICE VOTING!!!! Like @AndrewYang has suggested 👐🏾🧢#Yang2024 #YangGang
2
2
29
GIF
Replying to @marwilliamson
Thank you @marwilliamson your powerful voice is highly appreciated. Truth
2
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
Not really.
Replying to @marwilliamson
This theory contradicts that of the candidate you endorsed my friend. He and @TulsiGabbard are in favor of the current #SuperDelegate criteria. This would ultimately #RigMatters for @MikeBloomberg and the @DNC, and deny the popular vote. Y'all don't see the play". #ADOSPolitics
Replying to @marwilliamson
Caucuses are undemocratic, too. Only 2.5 percent of delegates have been awarded. It’s not very democratic to announce the nominee when 47 states have yet to vote.
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
The best example of this was the West Virginia primary in 2016. Sanders won every single county in the State and received fewer delegates than Clinton.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
They should not be called super delegates. They should be called anti-McGovern delegates. Bernie is their new McGovern.
Replying to @marwilliamson
It was created after the popular candidate, McGovern, lost 49 states in the 1972 election-- to Pres. Nixon, who presided over the highly unpopular Vietnam War & had already been implicated in Watergate break-in. With his fondness for Castro, etc., Sanders may do almost as bad.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Except this is what Sanders wanted in 2016. Wonder whats changed?
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
Shut up and go levitate some where else.