Very sly what’s going on here...
This tweet is unavailable

Feb 12, 2020 · 6:19 AM UTC

191
524
29
3,634
I’m sorry, but no, she’s not. It’s not stirring up trouble to observe reality and comment on it.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Stop creating trouble it’s delegate distribution fair and square
Replying to @marwilliamson
Thank you for addressing. I’ve been gaslighted in an abusive relationship, successfully left situation and now have PTSD with @DNC gaslighting.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
But New Hampshire not a winner take all state. All the candidates know what the rules were going in. How is that sly?
Replying to @marwilliamson
Wait until the superdelegates go for Hillary.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Delegates are not quite the same as votes. Pete is showing surprising skill at navigating the collection process. Also Sanders has not won enough more votes to have any meaningful distance. And with such a small sample size of delegates it doesn't mean much
1
Iowa delegates are apportioned at county level. Pete won 60 counties, Bernie won 18, Pete ended up with 1 more delegate than Bernie. imo it’s about finding a nominee more likely to win electoral college than a plurality of popular vote. (I’m for Amy.)
@marwilliamson VERY "Democratic" .@TheDemocrats .@DNC .@TomPerez BTW, Tom - When are YOU resigning???
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
We should get rid of the delegate game and the entire electoral college - it should be based on # of votes, period. If it were, HRC would be going into her 2nd term soon!
1
3