Those who would argue that ending war is a utopian goal unworthy of serious consideration are acquiescing to the idea that allowing an end to our species is somehow acceptable.

Feb 9, 2020 Β· 8:18 AM UTC

40
121
13
759
Replying to @marwilliamson
We cannot create what we cannot envision. The goal therefore must be peace. This is how we make progress. Dismissing this as β€œUtopian” and unattainable is self defeating. #peaceispossible
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
In today's world engulfed in capitalism, human suffering and death is a lucrative business. Most of the wars we have in the world are designed in boardrooms by top companies in the world, finance them in return 4 natural resources, like in libya, Mali, Iraq by creating war lords.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Why didn't you gain more traction? The world needs voices of moral authority and guidance, not the niggling "no we can't" parade of the visionless and weak
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Recently brothers Sanders has said as President he would reach out to all leaders around the world & say instead of spending trillions on weapons of death designed to destroy each other we should pool our resources to fight our common enemy: climate change. Please endorse him ❀
Replying to @marwilliamson
And those are the same ppl who do everything to smear, blackout &/ shadowban the only candidate still in the race who can objectively stand against these warmongering forces. Not standing up for peace is standing against it. Where do you stand? I #StandWithTulsi.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
How do you block someone on here? Enough already
Replying to @marwilliamson
Q: what would make you want to kill another person, if you're by nature, not a killer? A: Your government convinces you. In our case, it's a career path or college money.