Being anti-slavery simply meant you didn’t agree with slavery; being an abolitionist meant you’d crossed a bridge inside yourself, from “I don’t agree” to “Not on my watch.” Which are you in relation to a corporate aristocracy that has corrupted our govt and eroded our democracy?

Dec 24, 2019 · 9:17 AM UTC

80
321
26
1,650
Replying to @marwilliamson
$15 an hour at Amazon Beats the hell out of corporal punishment at any one of the tax-funded schools which still does that misguided stuff to Children. Private part erogenous Zone
Replying to @marwilliamson
I do not at all feel it is the same thing. And I find it to be disheartening you compare such. Slavery was sadly about beatings, rapes and murders... The corporate structure provides Lifestyles for families and jobs for people who who would not have had ✔ Be Good 👍
Replying to @marwilliamson
The problem would not be corporate aristocracy... It would be corrupt politicians. I can only tell you that I would be a great business operator in the name of free market capitalism, however the government violated my human rights, Bill of Rights. No trial by jury cruel punish😞
Replying to @marwilliamson
I simply don't agree with slavery.
Replying to @marwilliamson
I don’t think the answer is going after corporations other than making sure anti monopoly laws are strong. But homelessness at the level it is is wrong. I am a homelessness abolitionist.
Replying to @marwilliamson
I'm with you. What you're saying is the truth at a high level. Many aren't ready, but I am, so "not on my watch."
9
Replying to @marwilliamson
You always drill to the root of issues Marianne. Here, like all regimes, the tentacles of corruption all lead back to who is closest to the money printing press. The govt monopoly on money is unconstitutional. Please read The Bitcoin Standard. Sound, hard P2P money must return.
Replying to @marwilliamson
I'm definitely a "slave-driver" then. #ShowmetheMoney